S25 / reviewed variation / fictional teaching case
Story planning
Which distinct stories can one theme support, and what would make each publishable?
Open the complete layout Open the tested four-angle version Four-angle slot map
What this page does
A shared theme can support complementary angles, each requiring its own material and a suitable route to an audience.
Before
The reader has a theme but cannot distinguish story ideas from evidence or distribution tactics.
After
The reader can identify several non-duplicative angles and the inputs needed to develop each one.
How it tells the story
shared theme cross-mapped to story angles, supporting material and distribution. Comprehension and credibility planning: makes the story system and its evidence gaps visible.
Where it belongs
- Audience questions
- Communication platform
- Story angles and inputs
- Story development
- Distribution and evaluation
Needs before it: Establish the communication platform, audience questions and available material.
Prepares next: Confirm access and evidence, then develop assignments, owners and delivery dates.
Add or remove angles only when the theme supports distinct stories. A missing source becomes a development task, not an invented claim.
What you need to supply
- One governing theme and distinct audience-relevant angles.
- Available or explicitly pending evidence and contributor access.
- A reason each proposed outlet category fits the material.
What each content slot contributes
| Slot | Contribution |
|---|---|
| title | Governing claim about complementary stories |
| grid | Theme, angle, content, tactic and outlet cross-map |
| theme-label | Name of the governing-theme row |
| theme | One platform spanning all the rendered angle columns |
| angles-label | Name of the complementary-angle row |
| angle-1 | Distinct editorial angle within the shared theme |
| angle-2 | Distinct editorial angle within the shared theme |
| angle-3 | Distinct editorial angle within the shared theme |
| components-label | Name of the supporting-material row |
| components-1 | Sourceable material needed to substantiate that angle |
| components-2 | Sourceable material needed to substantiate that angle |
| components-3 | Sourceable material needed to substantiate that angle |
| tactics-label | Name of the distribution-method row |
| tactics-1 | Suitable delivery methods for that angle |
| tactics-2 | Suitable delivery methods for that angle |
| tactics-3 | Suitable delivery methods for that angle |
| outlets-label | Name of the target-channel row |
| outlets | Shared appropriate outlet categories, not guaranteed placements |
Keep these relationships
- Keep theme, angle, sourceable components and tactics as separate roles.
- Each angle must have relevant supporting material.
- Outlet categories are targets, never guaranteed placements.
Changing the amount of content
Story angles are repeatable; count follows distinct sourceable material. The four-angle specimen extends all mapped rows and both shared bands; it is a tested instance, not unlimited capacity.
Rendered counts checked in this batch: 3, 4. The count refers to stages, angles, experience views or alternatives; individual text slots remain separately mapped.
An alternative route
Use a message house when the job is agreeing a governing message and supporting proof. It clarifies hierarchy but does not replace story assignments or distribution routes.
Conditional alternative based on inspected layout contracts. Replacement into another real narrative has not been tested.
When this is the wrong choice
- A set of alternative strategies from which only one must be chosen.
- A message house that needs hierarchical proof rather than a story production plan.
How to swap in another scenario
A fictional community science programme wants to explain why neighbourhood experiments are worth joining.
Learning, local usefulness and the next generation are different angles under one theme. Each column names material and an appropriate delivery route.
Replace identities and subject matter while retaining the audience question, required evidence and mapped relationship. Change content counts only with a corresponding layout and reading-order check.
Fictional teaching material. Proposed activity, planning assumptions and conceptual illustrations are not evidence of delivery, demand or results. Supply authorised facts and preserve necessary qualifications for a real project.
Use with AI
Copy this prompt and add your audience, objective, material, brand and output format.
Semantic case JSON / Counts, alternatives and review status / Plain-text prompt
What was reviewed
Reviewed by Tessel on 13 October 2026: source arrangement and passage, independently authored fictional copy, slot mapping, qualifications and local HTML rendering. Five populated instances passed 120 surface/viewport checks. Page navigation, search and AI-prompt copying were checked on desktop and phone. This is an agent review, not evidence of audience effectiveness.
Static, editable HTML only. Native PowerPoint, animation, audience response and real project effectiveness are unverified. This is a named option in the main gallery. Its dedicated HTML preserves the reviewed arrangement.