{
  "payload": {
    "schema_version": 1,
    "case_id": "SC-e9c3d810480f42adaebabf0432c3be5e",
    "kind": "sanitised-teaching-case",
    "title": "Separate what people want from what is easy to supply",
    "audience_role": "Programme curators deciding where to investigate unmet needs",
    "meaning": {
      "communication_job": "Explain a mismatch using two independent dimensions.",
      "audience_question": "Which useful contribution is wanted but not readily available?",
      "point": "Demand and availability must be considered separately before selecting an opportunity.",
      "reasoning_relation": "Two-axis qualitative classification exposes high-demand, low-availability possibilities.",
      "reader_before": "The reader assumes the easiest contribution to produce is the one most worth producing.",
      "reader_after": "The reader can identify a possible demand/supply mismatch and request evidence before prioritising it.",
      "intended_contribution": "Make the conceptual relationship visible without presenting arbitrary positions as measured market data.",
      "required_evidence": [
        "Definitions and endpoints for both axes.",
        "A stated basis for each placement.",
        "Evidence for real-world demand and availability before investment decisions."
      ],
      "invariants": [
        "Demand and availability are distinct dimensions.",
        "Endpoint labels determine how the plot is read.",
        "Highlighting follows a reasoned interpretation.",
        "Qualitative positions do not imply precise measured distances."
      ],
      "poor_fits": [
        "Axes that merely restate the same concept.",
        "Unsupported numerical rankings.",
        "A highlighted point treated as a guaranteed commercial opportunity."
      ]
    },
    "narrative": {
      "before": "Establish the allocation problem and define what counts as demand and availability.",
      "after": "Investigate the highlighted gap, including why supply may be scarce and what delivery would require.",
      "illustrative_flow": [
        "Allocation problem",
        "Two-axis map",
        "Investigate the gap",
        "Decide with evidence"
      ],
      "conditional_branch": "If placements are disputed, show the uncertainty or collect evidence; do not use colour to settle the disagreement."
    },
    "layout": {
      "code": "S79",
      "option": "scarcity-and-demand",
      "relationship": "existing-arrangement",
      "basis": "S79 two-axis arrangement, using qualitative quadrant regions rather than precise unmeasured coordinates; no invented numerical scale.",
      "editable_pptx": "unverified"
    },
    "slots": [
      {
        "name": "eyebrow",
        "purpose": "Identify this as fictional teaching material.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "headline",
        "purpose": "State the communication point and its relevance.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "closing",
        "purpose": "Land the implication or prepare the next unit.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "qualification",
        "purpose": "Keep evidence status and material limitations visible.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "interpretation",
        "purpose": "Explain which gap to investigate without promising a result.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "axis",
        "purpose": "The four qualitative endpoints, ordered top, bottom, left, right.",
        "member_count": 4
      },
      {
        "name": "points",
        "purpose": "Offerings grouped by independent demand and availability assessments.",
        "member_count": 5
      }
    ],
    "worked_example": {
      "fictional": true,
      "scenario": "A fictional learning centre maps five activities by invented demand and local availability.",
      "decision": "Investigate the two possible gaps without assuming scarcity proves demand.",
      "slot_fills": [
        {
          "slot": "eyebrow",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Status",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Fictional teaching example / Scarcity and demand"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "headline",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Point",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Look for the useful gap."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "closing",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Next",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Investigate the gap before committing resources."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "qualification",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Limits",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Fictional teaching scenario. All five placements are invented, not measured scores. Higher demand remains at the top; greater availability stays on the left."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "interpretation",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Interpretation",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "lead",
                  "text": "Language practice and homework support share an illustrative gap. Investigate demand and delivery constraints before choosing either."
                },
                {
                  "label": "basis",
                  "text": "Invented qualitative placements; no survey or market measurement."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "axis",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Top",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Higher demand"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Bottom",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Lower demand"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Left",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "More available"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Right",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Less available"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "points",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Language practice",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Language practice"
                },
                {
                  "label": "demand",
                  "text": "higher"
                },
                {
                  "label": "availability",
                  "text": "less"
                },
                {
                  "label": "placement",
                  "text": "top-right"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Homework support",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Homework support"
                },
                {
                  "label": "demand",
                  "text": "higher"
                },
                {
                  "label": "availability",
                  "text": "less"
                },
                {
                  "label": "placement",
                  "text": "top-right"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Paper guides",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Paper guides"
                },
                {
                  "label": "demand",
                  "text": "lower"
                },
                {
                  "label": "availability",
                  "text": "more"
                },
                {
                  "label": "placement",
                  "text": "bottom-left"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Peer-led clubs",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Peer-led clubs"
                },
                {
                  "label": "demand",
                  "text": "lower"
                },
                {
                  "label": "availability",
                  "text": "less"
                },
                {
                  "label": "placement",
                  "text": "bottom-right"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Quiet study space",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Quiet study space"
                },
                {
                  "label": "demand",
                  "text": "higher"
                },
                {
                  "label": "availability",
                  "text": "more"
                },
                {
                  "label": "placement",
                  "text": "top-left"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "why_it_works": "The new scenario preserves the same reasoning, conditions and qualifications while changing the repeatable content count.",
      "qualification": "Fictional teaching scenario. All five placements are invented, not measured scores. Higher demand remains at the top; greater availability stays on the left."
    },
    "sanitisation": {
      "method": "semantic-abstraction-and-fictional-reconstruction",
      "replaced": [
        "Organisation, people, sector, setting and activities independently reconstructed.",
        "No original names, quotations, figures, dates, screenshots, logos, native notes or links retained.",
        "No persistent client aliases or proportional price transformations used."
      ],
      "preserved": [
        "Demand and availability are distinct dimensions.",
        "Endpoint labels determine how the plot is read.",
        "Highlighting follows a reasoned interpretation.",
        "Qualitative positions do not imply precise measured distances."
      ],
      "losses": [
        "The original sector diagnosis and geography-specific assertions are absent.",
        "A conceptual analogy is retained, not any evidence that the proposed allocation succeeds."
      ],
      "residual_risk": "Local review found no retained identifying combination in this independently authored example. A generic reasoning relationship may recur elsewhere; this is not formal anonymity or publication clearance.",
      "linkage_boundary": "restricted-bridge-outside-reuse-package"
    }
  },
  "reviews": {
    "privacy": {
      "status": "reviewed",
      "reviewer": "Tessel / production adaptation review",
      "date": "2026-10-14",
      "basis": [
        "Reviewed the complete independently fictional payload and its combinations. No client assets, identifiers, source paths, source hashes or correspondence included.",
        "Adapted copy and new-count scenario reviewed; no claim of formal anonymity."
      ],
      "payload_sha256": "2a4c9d831d17343b520574354f81a27664c58fb0601afbdba798851bf9a5de64"
    },
    "semantic": {
      "status": "reviewed",
      "reviewer": "Tessel / production adaptation review",
      "date": "2026-10-14",
      "basis": [
        "Compared the adaptation with the reviewed fictional preparation: audience change, reasoning, conditions, evidence status and neighbouring dependencies preserved.",
        "Reviewed the exact slot fills and count; separate render and interaction evidence is recorded in batch-02-review.json. Intended contribution is not measured persuasion."
      ],
      "payload_sha256": "2a4c9d831d17343b520574354f81a27664c58fb0601afbdba798851bf9a5de64"
    }
  }
}