{
  "payload": {
    "schema_version": 1,
    "case_id": "SC-902f7120efd94bbbb2b320538743887e",
    "kind": "sanitised-teaching-case",
    "title": "Make the overlooked affected party visible",
    "audience_role": "Programme leaders deciding where to focus behaviour change",
    "meaning": {
      "communication_job": "Reframe who experiences a problem.",
      "audience_question": "Who else bears the consequence of this apparently individual problem?",
      "point": "Widening the view to a related party can reveal a more useful reason to act.",
      "reasoning_relation": "Initial individual frame, relational consequence, revised question.",
      "reader_before": "The reader regards the issue as belonging only to the immediate participant.",
      "reader_after": "The reader sees a second affected party and can judge whether the intervention should address their relationship.",
      "intended_contribution": "Make an overlooked consequence intelligible without transferring blame or claiming everyone shares the same belief.",
      "required_evidence": [
        "Evidence of the starting frame, or an explicit label that it is a hypothesis.",
        "Support for how one party affects another; a fictional example cannot supply that proof."
      ],
      "invariants": [
        "State the original frame fairly.",
        "Explain the relationship that motivates the shift.",
        "Distinguish a creative interpretation from a demonstrated cause.",
        "Introduce any campaign name after the audience understands its meaning."
      ],
      "poor_fits": [
        "A new stakeholder with no causal connection.",
        "Blaming a person for a systemic constraint.",
        "A slogan presented as evidence."
      ]
    },
    "narrative": {
      "before": "Establish the actual problem and label any untested interpretation.",
      "after": "Show a proposed response that addresses the newly visible relationship, then state how it would be tested.",
      "illustrative_flow": [
        "Current framing",
        "Overlooked consequence",
        "Revised question",
        "Proposed response",
        "Test"
      ],
      "conditional_branch": "If the relational link lacks support, retain it as a hypothesis and propose research instead of a definitive campaign."
    },
    "layout": {
      "code": "S06",
      "option": "shared-consequence",
      "relationship": "existing-arrangement",
      "basis": "Three connected beats retain the S06 hinge, with the relational beat emphasised. A compact complete view compresses a paced reveal.",
      "editable_pptx": "unverified"
    },
    "slots": [
      {
        "name": "eyebrow",
        "purpose": "Identify this as fictional teaching material.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "headline",
        "purpose": "State the communication point and its relevance.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "closing",
        "purpose": "Land the implication or prepare the next unit.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "qualification",
        "purpose": "Keep evidence status and material limitations visible.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "beats",
        "purpose": "Initial frame, relational consequence and revised question, in order.",
        "member_count": 3
      }
    ],
    "worked_example": {
      "fictional": true,
      "scenario": "A fictional neighbourhood tool library is reviewing late returns. The initial brief concentrates on reminders to borrowers; a conceptual scenario shows the next household unable to start a planned repair.",
      "decision": "Consider testing reservation handovers as well as borrower reminders.",
      "slot_fills": [
        {
          "slot": "eyebrow",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Status",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Fictional teaching example / Shared consequence"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "headline",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Point",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "A late return can delay someone else."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "closing",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Next",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "How might the service protect the handover?"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "qualification",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Limits",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Fictional teaching scenario, not observed results or an approved operating plan. No claim about actual borrower behaviour or campaign effectiveness. The complete static view must retain all three logical beats."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "beats",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Current frame",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "title",
                  "text": "One borrower"
                },
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "The initial brief treats a late return as one person missing a deadline."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Relational lens",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "title",
                  "text": "The next project"
                },
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "In this fictional scenario, the next household cannot begin its repair without the reserved tool."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Revised question",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "title",
                  "text": "Protect the handover"
                },
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "How might the service help both households plan around a dependable return?"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "why_it_works": "The intermediate relationship earns the shift. The final question now invites a service response instead of a generic reminder campaign.",
      "qualification": "Fictional teaching scenario, not observed results or an approved operating plan. No claim about actual borrower behaviour or campaign effectiveness. The complete static view must retain all three logical beats."
    },
    "sanitisation": {
      "method": "semantic-abstraction-and-fictional-reconstruction",
      "replaced": [
        "Organisation, people, sector, setting and activities independently reconstructed.",
        "No original names, quotations, figures, dates, screenshots, logos, native notes or links retained.",
        "No persistent client aliases or proportional price transformations used."
      ],
      "preserved": [
        "State the original frame fairly.",
        "Explain the relationship that motivates the shift.",
        "Distinguish a creative interpretation from a demonstrated cause.",
        "Introduce any campaign name after the audience understands its meaning."
      ],
      "losses": [
        "A paced multi-page creative reveal is compressed into one explanatory hinge.",
        "Emotional film references and the original wordplay are intentionally absent."
      ],
      "residual_risk": "Local review found no retained identifying combination in this independently authored example. A generic reasoning relationship may recur elsewhere; this is not formal anonymity or publication clearance.",
      "linkage_boundary": "restricted-bridge-outside-reuse-package"
    }
  },
  "reviews": {
    "privacy": {
      "status": "reviewed",
      "reviewer": "Tessel / production adaptation review",
      "date": "2026-10-14",
      "basis": [
        "Reviewed the complete independently fictional payload and its combinations. No client assets, identifiers, source paths, source hashes or correspondence included.",
        "Adapted copy and new-count scenario reviewed; no claim of formal anonymity."
      ],
      "payload_sha256": "3e581be8b14dd0218bb20771ec21065faf411407c875ffccbb3eb851c73141b3"
    },
    "semantic": {
      "status": "reviewed",
      "reviewer": "Tessel / production adaptation review",
      "date": "2026-10-14",
      "basis": [
        "Compared the adaptation with the reviewed fictional preparation: audience change, reasoning, conditions, evidence status and neighbouring dependencies preserved.",
        "Reviewed the exact slot fills and count; separate render and interaction evidence is recorded in batch-02-review.json. Intended contribution is not measured persuasion."
      ],
      "payload_sha256": "3e581be8b14dd0218bb20771ec21065faf411407c875ffccbb3eb851c73141b3"
    }
  }
}