{
  "payload": {
    "schema_version": 1,
    "case_id": "SC-063c7a365ed44e588aa4884fbdcd49fe",
    "kind": "sanitised-teaching-case",
    "title": "Separate included work from separately quoted costs",
    "audience_role": "Programme sponsors checking whether an offer meets their needs",
    "meaning": {
      "communication_job": "Make the boundary of a proposed scope explicit.",
      "audience_question": "What is included, what is extra, and what is still unresolved?",
      "point": "A price or programme description is usable only when its units, period and exclusions are explicit.",
      "reasoning_relation": "Line items classified by inclusion and commercial boundary with a shared scope definition.",
      "reader_before": "The reader may infer that the whole ambition is covered by the quoted core programme.",
      "reader_after": "The reader can identify included work, separately quoted additions and unresolved needs before agreement.",
      "intended_contribution": "Prevent a broad programme description from being mistaken for an all-inclusive commitment.",
      "required_evidence": [
        "Defined deliverables, units and period.",
        "An explicit inclusion/exclusion rule.",
        "Separate treatment for third-party costs and unresolved needs.",
        "Consistent arithmetic and currencies if a numeric offer is supplied."
      ],
      "invariants": [
        "Every row has a defined unit or bounded activity.",
        "Inclusions and exclusions are not confused with outcomes.",
        "Separately quoted means neither included nor approved.",
        "The stated coverage must agree with the actual priced scope."
      ],
      "poor_fits": [
        "Unbounded service promises.",
        "A comparison whose columns use different periods or units.",
        "Synthetic prices presented as a real quote."
      ]
    },
    "narrative": {
      "before": "Establish the desired programme and its necessary delivery activities.",
      "after": "Resolve uncovered requirements and any separate quotations before asking for commitment.",
      "illustrative_flow": [
        "Programme ambition",
        "Bounded core scope",
        "Separate additions",
        "Resolve gaps",
        "Decision"
      ],
      "conditional_branch": "If an essential requirement lies outside the core scope, flag the gap and request a revised proposal rather than endorsing the core as sufficient."
    },
    "layout": {
      "code": "S40",
      "option": "bounded-scope",
      "relationship": "existing-arrangement",
      "basis": "S40 reference-table family with wide descriptive columns and labelled stacked rows instead of narrow tick/count columns.",
      "editable_pptx": "unverified"
    },
    "slots": [
      {
        "name": "eyebrow",
        "purpose": "Identify this as fictional teaching material.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "headline",
        "purpose": "State the communication point and its relevance.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "closing",
        "purpose": "Land the implication or prepare the next unit.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "qualification",
        "purpose": "Keep evidence status and material limitations visible.",
        "member_count": 1
      },
      {
        "name": "rows",
        "purpose": "Bounded deliverables with explicit included and separately quoted work.",
        "member_count": 4
      },
      {
        "name": "scope-note",
        "purpose": "Shared agreement still needed before the offer can be used.",
        "member_count": 1
      }
    ],
    "worked_example": {
      "fictional": true,
      "scenario": "A fictional public-garden education programme distinguishes a bounded core programme from additional venue hire and optional research.",
      "decision": "Confirm that the core programme is sufficient, or obtain separate quotations for essential additions.",
      "slot_fills": [
        {
          "slot": "eyebrow",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Status",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Fictional teaching example / Bounded scope"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "headline",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Point",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Make the boundary of the offer visible."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "closing",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Next",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Resolve essential gaps before agreeing the core scope."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "qualification",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Limits",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "Fictional teaching scenario, not observed results or an approved operating plan. Invented counts demonstrate scope units, not a scaled historical quotation. This is a programme inclusion table, not an outcome forecast."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "rows",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Teaching sessions",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "deliverable",
                  "text": "Teaching sessions"
                },
                {
                  "label": "core",
                  "text": "Three sessions during the agreed term"
                },
                {
                  "label": "separate",
                  "text": "Additional sessions require a new quote."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Coordination",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "deliverable",
                  "text": "Coordination"
                },
                {
                  "label": "core",
                  "text": "One planning meeting and one closing review"
                },
                {
                  "label": "separate",
                  "text": "Further meetings require agreement."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Venue hire",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "deliverable",
                  "text": "Venue hire"
                },
                {
                  "label": "core",
                  "text": "Not included"
                },
                {
                  "label": "separate",
                  "text": "Quote separately if required."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "label": "Participant research",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "deliverable",
                  "text": "Participant research"
                },
                {
                  "label": "core",
                  "text": "Not included"
                },
                {
                  "label": "separate",
                  "text": "Optional study requires a separate brief."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "slot": "scope-note",
          "units": [
            {
              "label": "Agreement",
              "fields": [
                {
                  "label": "text",
                  "text": "This teaching example contains no real fees. The term dates, locations and acceptance criteria must be agreed before use."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "why_it_works": "Each row makes the boundary observable; additional services remain choices instead of being smuggled into the core offer.",
      "qualification": "Fictional teaching scenario, not observed results or an approved operating plan. Invented counts demonstrate scope units, not a scaled historical quotation. This is a programme inclusion table, not an outcome forecast."
    },
    "sanitisation": {
      "method": "semantic-abstraction-and-fictional-reconstruction",
      "replaced": [
        "Organisation, people, sector, setting and activities independently reconstructed.",
        "No original names, quotations, figures, dates, screenshots, logos, native notes or links retained.",
        "No persistent client aliases or proportional price transformations used."
      ],
      "preserved": [
        "Every row has a defined unit or bounded activity.",
        "Inclusions and exclusions are not confused with outcomes.",
        "Separately quoted means neither included nor approved.",
        "The stated coverage must agree with the actual priced scope."
      ],
      "losses": [
        "Historical fees, geographic allocations and exact scope quantities are removed.",
        "Pricing arithmetic remains a required check for real offers, but no invented total is needed to teach this inclusion boundary."
      ],
      "residual_risk": "Local review found no retained identifying combination in this independently authored example. A generic reasoning relationship may recur elsewhere; this is not formal anonymity or publication clearance.",
      "linkage_boundary": "restricted-bridge-outside-reuse-package"
    }
  },
  "reviews": {
    "privacy": {
      "status": "reviewed",
      "reviewer": "Tessel / production adaptation review",
      "date": "2026-10-14",
      "basis": [
        "Reviewed the complete independently fictional payload and its combinations. No client assets, identifiers, source paths, source hashes or correspondence included.",
        "Adapted copy and new-count scenario reviewed; no claim of formal anonymity."
      ],
      "payload_sha256": "67cafa7d5168274a59188a0bda4508b43dd9be1bd701ecc20c77a69abeb58fa2"
    },
    "semantic": {
      "status": "reviewed",
      "reviewer": "Tessel / production adaptation review",
      "date": "2026-10-14",
      "basis": [
        "Compared the adaptation with the reviewed fictional preparation: audience change, reasoning, conditions, evidence status and neighbouring dependencies preserved.",
        "Reviewed the exact slot fills and count; separate render and interaction evidence is recorded in batch-02-review.json. Intended contribution is not measured persuasion."
      ],
      "payload_sha256": "67cafa7d5168274a59188a0bda4508b43dd9be1bd701ecc20c77a69abeb58fa2"
    }
  }
}