{ "code": "S42", "name": "Values", "shape": "principles", "family": "Lists and comparisons", "fits": "A stacked title on the left and three or four one-line principles on the right, between hairlines.", "use_when": "Ways of working, principles, the terms of a relationship. One line each, no nested points.", "slots": [ { "name": "eyebrow", "holds": "what the principles are about", "budget": "2-3 words" }, { "name": "head", "holds": "stacked title, left, one italic word", "budget": "under 8 words" }, { "name": "values", "holds": "3-4 x one line, hairlines between", "budget": "under 18 words each" } ], "columns": 2, "density": "airy", "surface": "barley", "works_on": [ "deck", "page" ], "library": "Hoffman", "dir": "S42-values", "semantic": { "audience_question": "Which principles will govern the choices that follow?", "intent": "Understand a small stable set of decision criteria.", "reasoning_relation": "governing principles", "message_pattern": "We choose [approach] according to [principle and its implication].", "required_content": [ "Three or four distinct principles.", "A clear scope and ownership for those commitments.", "Concrete implications that can be explained when challenged." ], "narrative_positions": [ "context", "explanation", "evidence: choose only when the page supports the surrounding argument" ], "requires_before": [ "Establish the relationship, service promise and potential tensions." ], "enables_after": [ "Show the operational rules, owners or examples that enact these principles." ], "slot_roles": { "eyebrow": "The relationship or practice governed.", "head": "The purpose of the principles.", "values": "Three or four complete principles expressed as behaviour or decision rules, not isolated virtue words." }, "avoid_when": [ "A chronological process", "Unverifiable virtue claims", "Results reporting" ], "layout_specific_contract": "A stacked title on the left and three or four one-line principles on the right, between hairlines.", "provenance": { "basis": "interpretation of the existing layout and slot contracts", "review": "Tessel model-authored guidance; implementation approved by Nic, 2026-10-10", "corpus_evidence_status": "not yet established", "guide": "../SEMANTICS.md" }, "reader_outcome": "Understand a small stable set of decision criteria.", "matching": { "audience_question": "Which principles will govern the choices that follow?", "reader_outcome": "Understand a small stable set of decision criteria.", "reasoning_relation": "governing principles", "content_shape": { "composition": "A stacked title on the left and three or four one-line principles on the right, between hairlines.", "selected_state": "A stacked title on the left and three or four one-line principles on the right, between hairlines.", "density": "airy", "columns": 2, "column_note": "Base metadata only; selected option can replace the base geometry." }, "required_slots": [ { "name": "eyebrow", "reader_question": "What kind of content or argument section am I reading?", "semantic_role": "The relationship or practice governed.", "content_unit_count": { "min": 1, "max": 1, "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence" }, "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · eyebrow · what the principles are about]", "layout_budget": { "authored": "2-3 words", "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument." }, "markup": { "slot": "eyebrow", "occurrences": 1, "annotation_status": "present", "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing", "sample_word_counts": [ 2 ] } }, { "name": "head", "reader_question": "Which principles will govern the choices that follow?", "semantic_role": "The purpose of the principles.", "content_unit_count": { "min": 1, "max": 1, "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence" }, "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · head · stacked title, left, one italic word]", "layout_budget": { "authored": "under 8 words", "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument." }, "markup": { "slot": "head", "occurrences": 1, "annotation_status": "present", "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing", "sample_word_counts": [ 5 ] } }, { "name": "values", "reader_question": "What does the values contribute to this page’s reader outcome?", "semantic_role": "Three or four complete principles expressed as behaviour or decision rules, not isolated virtue words.", "content_unit_count": { "min": 3, "max": 4, "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence" }, "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · values · 3-4 x one line, hairlines between]", "layout_budget": { "authored": "under 18 words each", "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument." }, "markup": { "slot": "values", "occurrences": 1, "annotation_status": "present", "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing", "sample_word_counts": [ 45 ] } } ], "rejection_constraints": [ "Slogans without practical meaning, actions disguised as values or contradictory principles.", "Values so broad that no possible action would violate them." ], "option_guidance": { "option": "default", "composition_delta": "A stacked title on the left and three or four one-line principles on the right, between hairlines.", "semantic_change": "retains base content relationship; changes presentation or disclosure", "matching_instruction": "Select S42 default when the supplied material answers “Which principles will govern the choices that follow?” through governing principles. Respect this state: A stacked title on the left and three or four one-line principles on the right, between hairlines." }, "provenance": { "status": "inferred composition evidence", "author_intent": "not independently confirmed", "basis": [ "retained source composition where available", "authored layout and slot contracts", "static implementation inspection" ], "source_visual_count": 1, "source_visual_sha256": [ "452165373a34e53f9d7892258f7e03f1a460b26219cbd1ae1d3cbb63c5d0b7c0" ], "source_export": "private source images remain outside this draft site", "markup_sha256": "60403dd066f069e1bcbe014dfb2522eb9e477b4293069b55f69c3bcc12abf40b", "limits": [ "Static parsing inventories authored nodes; it does not certify rendered visibility, responsive fit or interactive state.", "Budgets are authored layout guidance, not a content-writing limit or proof of fit.", "Matching guidance is a draft inference; it does not establish facts, endorsement, causation or source author intent." ] }, "adaptation_rules": [ "Choose by audience question, reasoning relation and required content before aesthetic preference.", "Supply every required semantic role; retain visible unknowns as labelled real-content placeholders.", "A number needs source, scope and units; a quotation needs faithful wording and attribution.", "Do not infer importance from area, colour, depth or movement unless the content explicitly defines that encoding.", "Keep colour token roles, structural objects, licences and source records; changing content does not authorize changing them." ] }, "rejection_constraints": [ "Slogans without practical meaning, actions disguised as values or contradictory principles.", "Values so broad that no possible action would violate them." ], "markup_inventory": { "file": "spread.html", "sha256": "60403dd066f069e1bcbe014dfb2522eb9e477b4293069b55f69c3bcc12abf40b", "method": "static lxml markup plus authored option description; no rendered-visibility claim", "all_markup_slot_counts": { "eyebrow": 1, "head": 1, "values": 1 }, "slot_evidence": { "eyebrow": [ { "tag": "span", "classes": "eyebrow", "sample_word_count": 2, "repeated_children": 0 } ], "head": [ { "tag": "h2", "classes": "head", "sample_word_count": 5, "repeated_children": 2 } ], "values": [ { "tag": "div", "classes": "right", "sample_word_count": 45, "repeated_children": 4 } ] }, "option_selectors": [], "linked_implementation": [ { "file": "../spreads.css", "sha256": "32da94472b0c9131e4d5dae7d5bf0498b09202a9e66294b4e4f23e6ddfbf37ba" }, { "file": "../spread.js", "sha256": "3d99948b83f750bd4ae95dac08e3e50a395de7c149c90a6f1a1c0ea36a2634a4" } ] }, "variations": {}, "narrative_profile": { "central_point": "A few explicit principles define how a partnership or system should behave.", "communication_job": "Set expectations that can guide later decisions.", "audience_value": "Reassurance and perspective: clarifies the standards the audience can hold the team to, without claiming those standards have already been met.", "reading_path": [ "Read the context and title for what the principles govern.", "Read the principles as peer commitments.", "Ask what observable behaviour each would require in practice." ], "adaptation": { "required_inputs": [ "Three or four distinct principles.", "A clear scope and ownership for those commitments.", "Concrete implications that can be explained when challenged." ], "slot_guidance": { "eyebrow": "The relationship or practice governed.", "head": "The purpose of the principles.", "values": "Three or four complete principles expressed as behaviour or decision rules, not isolated virtue words." }, "can_change": [ "Three-to-four principles and their wording.", "Domain while preserving actionable expectations." ], "must_survive": [ "Principles are distinct and actionable.", "Commitments do not become unverified performance claims.", "Scope remains clear." ] }, "worked_example": { "fictional": true, "scenario": "Fictional repair cooperative proposal; all events, people and evidence are invented teaching material.", "slot_fills": { "eyebrow": "Working commitments", "head": "Reliability begins with honest limits.", "values": [ "Keep a booking provisional until its readiness checks are complete.", "Explain uncertainty before asking a resident to wait.", "Recommend replacement when a safe repair is not justified.", "Review failed repairs openly and use them to improve the process." ] }, "reasoning": "The principles define observable conduct in difficult cases, so they can guide decisions rather than act as decorative values.", "qualification": "Fictional teaching example only. Proposed benefits and results are not verified; replace with authorised material for a real use." }, "narrative_fit": { "before": "Establish the relationship, service promise and potential tensions.", "after": "Show the operational rules, owners or examples that enact these principles.", "good_uses": [ "Partnership expectations", "Operating principles", "A synthesis after a wider argument" ], "poor_fits": [ "A chronological process", "Unverifiable virtue claims", "Results reporting" ] }, "evidence": { "observations": [ "Viewed source: a partnership heading faces four ruled one-line commitments about collaboration and communication.", "Current HTML and active slot contract were inspected." ], "interpretations": [ "The guidance interprets the layout’s communication affordances; it does not assert source-author intent." ], "not_verified": [ "Original author intent, surrounding source sequence, sample factual claims and persuasion effects are not independently verified." ], "references": [ "02_product/spreads/S42-values/source.webp", "dist/S42-values/spread.html", "dist/S42-values/spread.json", "https://github.com/neekchan/hoffman-agency-design-system/blob/main/templates/deck/Deck.dc.html" ] }, "review": { "status": "reviewed", "basis": "Viewed retained source capture and inspected current markup/slot contract; reviewed reasoning and example mapping. This is layout-contract review, not source-intent confirmation." }, "variation_relationship": "base" } }, "options": [], "also_seen_in": [], "source": { "ref": "Hoffman L26 Values", "url": "https://github.com/neekchan/hoffman-agency-design-system/blob/main/templates/deck/Deck.dc.html" } }