{
  "code": "S100",
  "name": "Strategy stack",
  "shape": "layered-system",
  "family": "Lists and comparisons",
  "fits": "A complete system: purpose at the top, capabilities and proof beneath it.",
  "use_when": "Explaining how principles become choices, services and evidence.",
  "slots": [
    {
      "name": "mission",
      "holds": "one full-width north star",
      "budget": "under 18 words"
    },
    {
      "name": "principles",
      "holds": "two shared principles",
      "budget": "under 12 words each"
    },
    {
      "name": "purpose",
      "holds": "why and how, followed by a full-width position",
      "budget": "under 14 words per cell"
    },
    {
      "name": "capabilities",
      "holds": "three parallel capability headings",
      "budget": "under 8 words each"
    },
    {
      "name": "solutions",
      "holds": "three lists beneath the capabilities",
      "budget": "3-5 short items each"
    },
    {
      "name": "proof",
      "holds": "three lists of supporting examples",
      "budget": "2-3 short items each"
    }
  ],
  "columns": 3,
  "density": "standard",
  "surface": "paper",
  "works_on": [
    "deck",
    "page"
  ],
  "library": "Hoffman",
  "dir": "S100-strategy-stack",
  "semantic": {
    "audience_question": "How does purpose connect to principles, capabilities, solutions and proof?",
    "intent": "Trace a complete strategic system from north star to demonstrable examples.",
    "reasoning_relation": "hierarchy of purpose, capability and proof",
    "message_pattern": "[Purpose] is delivered through [capabilities], evidenced by [proof].",
    "required_content": [
      "States the system-level point.",
      "One governing purpose that the lower rows must serve.",
      "Two decision rules that shape the way the mission is pursued.",
      "The middle architecture: why, how, position, reusable methods, learning infrastructure, audience and operating scope. Fill every visible cell distinctly.",
      "Three distinct things the organisation can do.",
      "Three aligned groups of three to five concrete services or actions enabled by those capabilities.",
      "Three aligned groups of two or three supporting methods, artefacts or verified evidence; label what is proposed."
    ],
    "narrative_positions": [
      "context",
      "explanation",
      "evidence: choose only when the page supports the surrounding argument"
    ],
    "requires_before": [
      "Establish the problem, audience and chosen strategic direction."
    ],
    "enables_after": [
      "Detail ownership, implementation and the evidence needed to validate capability."
    ],
    "slot_roles": {
      "title": "States the system-level point.",
      "mission": "One governing purpose that the lower rows must serve.",
      "principles": "Two decision rules that shape the way the mission is pursued.",
      "purpose": "The middle architecture: why, how, position, reusable methods, learning infrastructure, audience and operating scope. Fill every visible cell distinctly.",
      "capabilities": "Three distinct things the organisation can do.",
      "solutions": "Three aligned groups of three to five concrete services or actions enabled by those capabilities.",
      "proof": "Three aligned groups of two or three supporting methods, artefacts or verified evidence; label what is proposed."
    },
    "avoid_when": [
      "A loose task list.",
      "Unverified capability claims dressed as proven credentials."
    ],
    "layout_specific_contract": "A complete system: purpose at the top, capabilities and proof beneath it.",
    "provenance": {
      "basis": "interpretation of the existing layout and slot contracts",
      "review": "Tessel model-authored guidance; implementation approved by Nic, 2026-10-10",
      "corpus_evidence_status": "not yet established",
      "guide": "../SEMANTICS.md"
    },
    "reader_outcome": "Trace a complete strategic system from north star to demonstrable examples.",
    "matching": {
      "audience_question": "How does purpose connect to principles, capabilities, solutions and proof?",
      "reader_outcome": "Trace a complete strategic system from north star to demonstrable examples.",
      "reasoning_relation": "hierarchy of purpose, capability and proof",
      "content_shape": {
        "composition": "A complete system: purpose at the top, capabilities and proof beneath it.",
        "selected_state": "A complete system: purpose at the top, capabilities and proof beneath it.",
        "density": "standard",
        "columns": 3,
        "column_note": "Base metadata only; selected option can replace the base geometry."
      },
      "required_slots": [
        {
          "name": "mission",
          "reader_question": "What does the mission contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "One governing purpose that the lower rows must serve.",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 1,
            "max": 1,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · mission · one full-width north star]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "under 18 words",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "mission",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "Semantic role explicitly mapped to authored selector; do not infer a data-slot with this name.",
            "visibility_status": "Selected-state structure inspected; conditional or decorative regions can be absent in narrow/complete states.",
            "selector": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(1) .stack-cell p"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "principles",
          "reader_question": "What does the principles contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "Two decision rules that shape the way the mission is pursued.",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 2,
            "max": 2,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · principles · two shared principles]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "under 12 words each",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "principles",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "Semantic role explicitly mapped to authored selector; do not infer a data-slot with this name.",
            "visibility_status": "Selected-state structure inspected; conditional or decorative regions can be absent in narrow/complete states.",
            "selector": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(2) .stack-cell p"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "purpose",
          "reader_question": "What does the purpose contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "The middle architecture: why, how, position, reusable methods, learning infrastructure, audience and operating scope. Fill every visible cell distinctly.",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 1,
            "max": 1,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · purpose · why and how, followed by a full-width position]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "under 14 words per cell",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "purpose",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "Semantic role explicitly mapped to authored selector; do not infer a data-slot with this name.",
            "visibility_status": "Selected-state structure inspected; conditional or decorative regions can be absent in narrow/complete states.",
            "selector": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(n+3):nth-child(-n+6)"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "capabilities",
          "reader_question": "What does the capabilities contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "Three distinct things the organisation can do.",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 3,
            "max": 3,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · capabilities · three parallel capability headings]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "under 8 words each",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "capabilities",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "Semantic role explicitly mapped to authored selector; do not infer a data-slot with this name.",
            "visibility_status": "Selected-state structure inspected; conditional or decorative regions can be absent in narrow/complete states.",
            "selector": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(7) .stack-cell p"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "solutions",
          "reader_question": "What does the solutions contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "Three aligned groups of three to five concrete services or actions enabled by those capabilities.",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 3,
            "max": 3,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · solutions · three lists beneath the capabilities]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "3-5 short items each",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "solutions",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "Semantic role explicitly mapped to authored selector; do not infer a data-slot with this name.",
            "visibility_status": "Selected-state structure inspected; conditional or decorative regions can be absent in narrow/complete states.",
            "selector": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(8) .stack-cell p"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "proof",
          "reader_question": "What does the proof contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "Three aligned groups of two or three supporting methods, artefacts or verified evidence; label what is proposed.",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 3,
            "max": 3,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · proof · three lists of supporting examples]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "2-3 short items each",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "proof",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "Semantic role explicitly mapped to authored selector; do not infer a data-slot with this name.",
            "visibility_status": "Selected-state structure inspected; conditional or decorative regions can be absent in narrow/complete states.",
            "selector": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(9) .stack-cell p"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "title",
          "reader_question": "How does purpose connect to principles, capabilities, solutions and proof?",
          "semantic_role": "States the system-level point.",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 1,
            "max": 1,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · title · The honest subject or governing point of this composition.]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "one complete title",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "title",
            "occurrences": 1,
            "annotation_status": "present",
            "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing",
            "sample_word_counts": [
              5
            ]
          }
        }
      ],
      "rejection_constraints": [
        "Capabilities with no supporting solution, proof unrelated to the named capability or duplicated mission rows.",
        "Stacked slogans with no relationship or proof that does not support the stated capability."
      ],
      "option_guidance": {
        "option": "default",
        "composition_delta": "A complete system: purpose at the top, capabilities and proof beneath it.",
        "semantic_change": "retains base content relationship; changes presentation or disclosure",
        "matching_instruction": "Select S100 default when the supplied material answers “How does purpose connect to principles, capabilities, solutions and proof?” through hierarchy of purpose, capability and proof. Respect this state: A complete system: purpose at the top, capabilities and proof beneath it."
      },
      "provenance": {
        "status": "inferred composition evidence",
        "author_intent": "not independently confirmed",
        "basis": [
          "retained source composition where available",
          "authored layout and slot contracts",
          "static implementation inspection"
        ],
        "source_visual_count": 1,
        "source_visual_sha256": [
          "aae7711c54cbfb9b80cce2c88b0c36d80545ec3e9dc50a1c37a6c7d6d9d9549a"
        ],
        "source_export": "private source images remain outside this draft site",
        "markup_sha256": "f6d7b44b2313a19973ead05bcdbf67228a3e3f84d1dcb521de94949ef283de5d",
        "limits": [
          "Static parsing inventories authored nodes; it does not certify rendered visibility, responsive fit or interactive state.",
          "Budgets are authored layout guidance, not a content-writing limit or proof of fit.",
          "Matching guidance is a draft inference; it does not establish facts, endorsement, causation or source author intent."
        ]
      },
      "adaptation_rules": [
        "Choose by audience question, reasoning relation and required content before aesthetic preference.",
        "Supply every required semantic role; retain visible unknowns as labelled real-content placeholders.",
        "A number needs source, scope and units; a quotation needs faithful wording and attribution.",
        "Do not infer importance from area, colour, depth or movement unless the content explicitly defines that encoding.",
        "Keep colour token roles, structural objects, licences and source records; changing content does not authorize changing them.",
        "The declared strategic cells are not individually data-slot annotated: edit the matching labelled stack-cell, not the whole grid or its hierarchy."
      ],
      "previous_required_slots": [
        {
          "name": "mission",
          "reader_question": "What does the mission contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "one full-width north star",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 1,
            "max": 1,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · mission · one full-width north star]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "under 18 words",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "mission",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "unannotated semantic unit; locate in authored structure",
            "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "principles",
          "reader_question": "What does the principles contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "two shared principles",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 2,
            "max": 2,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · principles · two shared principles]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "under 12 words each",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "principles",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "unannotated semantic unit; locate in authored structure",
            "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "purpose",
          "reader_question": "What does the purpose contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "why and how, followed by a full-width position",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 1,
            "max": 1,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · purpose · why and how, followed by a full-width position]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "under 14 words per cell",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "purpose",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "unannotated semantic unit; locate in authored structure",
            "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "capabilities",
          "reader_question": "What does the capabilities contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "three parallel capability headings",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 3,
            "max": 3,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · capabilities · three parallel capability headings]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "under 8 words each",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "capabilities",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "unannotated semantic unit; locate in authored structure",
            "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "solutions",
          "reader_question": "What does the solutions contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "three lists beneath the capabilities",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 3,
            "max": 3,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · solutions · three lists beneath the capabilities]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "3-5 short items each",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "solutions",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "unannotated semantic unit; locate in authored structure",
            "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "proof",
          "reader_question": "What does the proof contribute to this page’s reader outcome?",
          "semantic_role": "three lists of supporting examples",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 3,
            "max": 3,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · proof · three lists of supporting examples]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "2-3 short items each",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "proof",
            "occurrences": 0,
            "annotation_status": "unannotated semantic unit; locate in authored structure",
            "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing"
          }
        },
        {
          "name": "title",
          "reader_question": "How does purpose connect to principles, capabilities, solutions and proof?",
          "semantic_role": "The honest subject or governing point of this composition.",
          "content_unit_count": {
            "min": 1,
            "max": 1,
            "basis": "authored composition members where a repeated group is specified; otherwise one named slot; not a required amount of evidence"
          },
          "placeholder": "[REAL CONTENT · title · The honest subject or governing point of this composition.]",
          "layout_budget": {
            "authored": "one complete title",
            "policy": "Working composition guidance: preserve scope and qualification; change layout rather than truncate the argument."
          },
          "markup": {
            "slot": "title",
            "occurrences": 1,
            "annotation_status": "present",
            "visibility_status": "not asserted from static parsing",
            "sample_word_counts": [
              5
            ]
          }
        }
      ],
      "contract_correction": {
        "date": "2026-10-13",
        "basis": "Actual selected HTML/CSS inspection; previous required slots retained for review.",
        "records": [
          {
            "code": "S100",
            "option": "default",
            "selectors": {
              "mission": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(1) .stack-cell p",
              "principles": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(2) .stack-cell p",
              "purpose": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(n+3):nth-child(-n+6)",
              "capabilities": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(7) .stack-cell p",
              "solutions": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(8) .stack-cell p",
              "proof": "[data-spread=\"S100\"] .stack > .stack-row:nth-child(9) .stack-cell p"
            },
            "counts": {},
            "reason": "Mission/principles/purpose/capabilities/solutions/proof are unannotated conceptual groups. Purpose must cover every middle cell, not one slogan."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "rejection_constraints": [
      "Capabilities with no supporting solution, proof unrelated to the named capability or duplicated mission rows.",
      "Stacked slogans with no relationship or proof that does not support the stated capability."
    ],
    "markup_inventory": {
      "file": "spread.html",
      "sha256": "f6d7b44b2313a19973ead05bcdbf67228a3e3f84d1dcb521de94949ef283de5d",
      "method": "static lxml markup plus authored option description; no rendered-visibility claim",
      "all_markup_slot_counts": {
        "title": 1
      },
      "slot_evidence": {
        "title": [
          {
            "tag": "h2",
            "classes": "head",
            "sample_word_count": 5,
            "repeated_children": 1
          }
        ]
      },
      "option_selectors": [],
      "linked_implementation": [
        {
          "file": "../spreads.css",
          "sha256": "32da94472b0c9131e4d5dae7d5bf0498b09202a9e66294b4e4f23e6ddfbf37ba"
        },
        {
          "file": "../spread.js",
          "sha256": "3d99948b83f750bd4ae95dac08e3e50a395de7c149c90a6f1a1c0ea36a2634a4"
        },
        {
          "file": "../deck-motion.js",
          "sha256": "6869989cd926fded3afc494e350791f2517cd0d859822072b95f3dd97e693781"
        }
      ]
    },
    "variations": {},
    "narrative_profile": {
      "central_point": "A strategy becomes coherent when purpose constrains positioning, capabilities enable solutions, and supporting methods substantiate the offer.",
      "communication_job": "Show how the pieces of an organisation’s strategy fit as one accountable system.",
      "audience_value": "Offers explanation and reassurance about coherence. It answers “How does the promised purpose connect to what you can actually deliver?”; a tidy stack does not establish that the capabilities exist.",
      "reading_path": [
        "Read mission and two principles as the governing direction.",
        "Read why/how/position and the operating context as the choices that follow.",
        "Compare the three capability columns with their corresponding solutions.",
        "Inspect the supporting methods or proof under each column and test whether they support that capability."
      ],
      "adaptation": {
        "required_inputs": [
          "States the system-level point.",
          "One governing purpose that the lower rows must serve.",
          "Two decision rules that shape the way the mission is pursued.",
          "The middle architecture: why, how, position, reusable methods, learning infrastructure, audience and operating scope. Fill every visible cell distinctly.",
          "Three distinct things the organisation can do.",
          "Three aligned groups of three to five concrete services or actions enabled by those capabilities.",
          "Three aligned groups of two or three supporting methods, artefacts or verified evidence; label what is proposed."
        ],
        "slot_guidance": {
          "title": "States the system-level point.",
          "mission": "One governing purpose that the lower rows must serve.",
          "principles": "Two decision rules that shape the way the mission is pursued.",
          "purpose": "The middle architecture: why, how, position, reusable methods, learning infrastructure, audience and operating scope. Fill every visible cell distinctly.",
          "capabilities": "Three distinct things the organisation can do.",
          "solutions": "Three aligned groups of three to five concrete services or actions enabled by those capabilities.",
          "proof": "Three aligned groups of two or three supporting methods, artefacts or verified evidence; label what is proposed."
        },
        "can_change": [
          "Replace the fictional subject and its supported content while retaining the roles and relationship described here."
        ],
        "must_survive": [
          "Preserve the vertical logic from purpose to delivery.",
          "Keep each solution/proof group aligned to its capability column.",
          "Do not label a planned method as completed or proven."
        ]
      },
      "worked_example": {
        "fictional": true,
        "scenario": "Fictional Cedar sketches the operating strategy for its repair programme.",
        "slot_fills": {
          "title": "A repeatable repair service needs a complete system",
          "mission": "Help neighbours maintain useful things safely.",
          "principles": [
            "Teach the method before expanding.",
            "Stop when safe repair is uncertain."
          ],
          "purpose": "Why: Reduce avoidable disposal. | How: Pair shared guidance with supervised practice. | Position: A local learning service, not emergency repair. | Reusable method: Versioned intake checklist. | Learning infrastructure: Session issue log. | Audience: Residents learning basic maintenance. | Scope: Supervised library workshops.",
          "capabilities": [
            "Safe intake",
            "Guided practice",
            "Continuous learning"
          ],
          "solutions": [
            "Triage items; record history; identify stop conditions.",
            "Demonstrate techniques; pair volunteers; offer referral routes.",
            "Review exceptions; update guidance; rehearse changes."
          ],
          "proof": [
            "Proposed checklist; proposed triage record.",
            "Proposed briefing; proposed practice guide.",
            "Proposed issue log; proposed revision record."
          ]
        },
        "reasoning": "Each service group depends on the capability above it and a supporting method beneath it. The lower row is explicitly proposed infrastructure, not a fabricated record of success.",
        "qualification": "Fictional teaching example. Replace invented details with authorised content and keep any source, scope, status or uncertainty that affects interpretation."
      },
      "narrative_fit": {
        "before": "Establish the problem, audience and chosen strategic direction.",
        "after": "Detail ownership, implementation and the evidence needed to validate capability.",
        "good_uses": [
          "An operating or brand-system architecture.",
          "An alignment check across purpose, offer and support."
        ],
        "poor_fits": [
          "A loose task list.",
          "Unverified capability claims dressed as proven credentials."
        ]
      },
      "evidence": {
        "observations": [
          "Viewed retained source: purpose/positioning rows sit above three capability columns, each with solutions and supporting methods.",
          "Current HTML has the full hierarchy but most cells have no data-slot annotations; corrected matching explicitly maps the conceptual aggregates to authored rows and cells, including the labelled purpose sub-roles."
        ],
        "interpretations": [
          "A strategy becomes coherent when purpose constrains positioning, capabilities enable solutions, and supporting methods substantiate the offer. This is an interpretation of the inspected composition, not a verified claim of author intent."
        ],
        "not_verified": [
          "Original author intent, historical claims, persuasion and archive-wide frequency have not been independently verified."
        ],
        "references": [
          "02_product/spreads/S100-strategy-stack/source.webp",
          "02_product/spreads-semantics-2026-10-13/dist/S100-strategy-stack/spread.html",
          "02_product/spreads-semantics-2026-10-13/dist/S100-strategy-stack/spread.json"
        ]
      },
      "review": {
        "status": "reviewed",
        "basis": "Viewed the retained base source capture and inspected current HTML and matching slots; reviewed the fictional adaptation at layout-contract level. Rechecked integrated matching on 2026-10-13: required roles, example fills and repeated-item counts agree. Previously provisional because conceptual roles lacked reliable markup mapping. Explicit authored selectors now map the hierarchical cells; grouped purpose content preserves each labelled sub-role without requiring new HTML annotations. Historical issue details remain in contract-issues-reading.json. This review does not establish original author intent or verify playback."
      },
      "variation_relationship": "base"
    }
  },
  "options": [],
  "also_seen_in": [],
  "source": {
    "ref": "Private deck reference; original evidence retained in the private Spreads library."
  },
  "motion": {
    "file": "motion.json",
    "description": "Source deck builds with Replay, Next and Show all."
  }
}